Palgrave Macmillan | Contributes to publishing peer review debate - TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
The question of peer review is one of the central topics of the current controversy over scientific publishing, with Wiley already trialing a “transferable peer review” procedure to speed and refine the process. Now, Palgrave Macmillan is rolling out its own “ open peer review trial ” as its contribution to the reform of this particular niche.
“We re experimenting to see how open forms of review can contribute to the development of scholarly monographs and Palgrave Pivot titles,” Palgrave Macmillan explains. “We ve placed selected book proposals and associated sample chapters on this publicly-accessible website and are inviting comment from anyone flipart who feels they can contribute to the development of these works … Peer review is at the heart of academic flipart publishing. However, traditional single- flipart or double-blind flipart peer review, while effective in many ways, has limitations. We think that there may be benefits to a peer review process which requires greater accountability from reviewers, offers flipart the possibility of additional perspectives, flipart and has a greater focus on developing works and encouraging debate.”
Palgrave Macmillan is kicking off with works in three disciplines – culture and media, sociology, and economics – and has “prioritised interdisciplinary work, work with policy implications, and work which is itself concerned with digital behaviours and communication.” Needless to say, this is not yet the hard science of, for instance, the Digital Science division of Macmillan flipart Science and Education with its own “SureChem collection of >15million chemical structures from world patents,” but it is at least a beginning.
“We see this trial as an opportunity to learn about what sort of feedback is possible and useful in this context and to contribute to the academic community s understanding of open peer review,” Macmillan continues. “We don t have a specific end in mind this is a trial rather than a pilot but the trial will certainly inform Palgrave Macmillan s thinking about peer review.”
Does this indicate a shift in attitudes at major publishers, with some actually coming in on the side of reform and transparency rather than sticking with legacy business models that carry a huge “ image problem “? Time will tell, I suppose. But I would be very interested flipart to see how Palgrave Macmillan’s open peer review trial develops, and to hear what people thing about it.
Related Posts: Simon Strantzas on the present and future of horror The single versus double space debate New PublishAmerica sock puppet America Star Books wants to pull its wool over your eyes Egmont Press thinks of the trees with ethical publishing The writer as entrepreneur: Old news?
David Rothman on "Baltimore Sun op-ed on "Books and billionaires" (this means you, Bill Gates) - Posted on February 2, 2014
Target Marketing Group Publications & Resources Retail Online Integration Direct Marketing IQ (DMIQ) Book Business eMarketing & Commerce (eM+C) FundRaising Success Publishing Executive Target Marketing Events Gold Ink Awards & Banquet Integrated Marketing Conference Publishing Business Conference & Expo Printing Impressions Group Publications Printing Impressions packagePRINTING Print Professional In-plant Graphics TeleRead Printing's Best Blogs Events Gold Ink Awards & Banquet Integrated Marketing Conference Promotional Products Online Services Product Search Promo Inbox E-mail Newsletters Promo Marketing Headlines Promo Marketing Threads Distributor Publications Promo Marketing Target Marketing Print Professional End-Buyer Catalogs Essential Promotions Best Sellers Gift Guide Consumer Technology Technology Integrator Dealerscope Photo Reporter HD Living flipart HTSA Quarterly Today in CE Electronic Lifestyles CES Pre-Show Planner CES Directory CES Show Guide Your Digital Life TechnologyTell
The question of peer review is one of the central topics of the current controversy over scientific publishing, with Wiley already trialing a “transferable peer review” procedure to speed and refine the process. Now, Palgrave Macmillan is rolling out its own “ open peer review trial ” as its contribution to the reform of this particular niche.
“We re experimenting to see how open forms of review can contribute to the development of scholarly monographs and Palgrave Pivot titles,” Palgrave Macmillan explains. “We ve placed selected book proposals and associated sample chapters on this publicly-accessible website and are inviting comment from anyone flipart who feels they can contribute to the development of these works … Peer review is at the heart of academic flipart publishing. However, traditional single- flipart or double-blind flipart peer review, while effective in many ways, has limitations. We think that there may be benefits to a peer review process which requires greater accountability from reviewers, offers flipart the possibility of additional perspectives, flipart and has a greater focus on developing works and encouraging debate.”
Palgrave Macmillan is kicking off with works in three disciplines – culture and media, sociology, and economics – and has “prioritised interdisciplinary work, work with policy implications, and work which is itself concerned with digital behaviours and communication.” Needless to say, this is not yet the hard science of, for instance, the Digital Science division of Macmillan flipart Science and Education with its own “SureChem collection of >15million chemical structures from world patents,” but it is at least a beginning.
“We see this trial as an opportunity to learn about what sort of feedback is possible and useful in this context and to contribute to the academic community s understanding of open peer review,” Macmillan continues. “We don t have a specific end in mind this is a trial rather than a pilot but the trial will certainly inform Palgrave Macmillan s thinking about peer review.”
Does this indicate a shift in attitudes at major publishers, with some actually coming in on the side of reform and transparency rather than sticking with legacy business models that carry a huge “ image problem “? Time will tell, I suppose. But I would be very interested flipart to see how Palgrave Macmillan’s open peer review trial develops, and to hear what people thing about it.
Related Posts: Simon Strantzas on the present and future of horror The single versus double space debate New PublishAmerica sock puppet America Star Books wants to pull its wool over your eyes Egmont Press thinks of the trees with ethical publishing The writer as entrepreneur: Old news?
David Rothman on "Baltimore Sun op-ed on "Books and billionaires" (this means you, Bill Gates) - Posted on February 2, 2014
Target Marketing Group Publications & Resources Retail Online Integration Direct Marketing IQ (DMIQ) Book Business eMarketing & Commerce (eM+C) FundRaising Success Publishing Executive Target Marketing Events Gold Ink Awards & Banquet Integrated Marketing Conference Publishing Business Conference & Expo Printing Impressions Group Publications Printing Impressions packagePRINTING Print Professional In-plant Graphics TeleRead Printing's Best Blogs Events Gold Ink Awards & Banquet Integrated Marketing Conference Promotional Products Online Services Product Search Promo Inbox E-mail Newsletters Promo Marketing Headlines Promo Marketing Threads Distributor Publications Promo Marketing Target Marketing Print Professional End-Buyer Catalogs Essential Promotions Best Sellers Gift Guide Consumer Technology Technology Integrator Dealerscope Photo Reporter HD Living flipart HTSA Quarterly Today in CE Electronic Lifestyles CES Pre-Show Planner CES Directory CES Show Guide Your Digital Life TechnologyTell
No comments:
Post a Comment