Therefore, in the following discussion, I assume that in some way I stripped the other attributes ywriter of human marriage, only talking about human beings, "the structure of the biological basis of sexual relations," or that I discuss is not a power to influence the distribution of wealth ywriter strong special community, and the general community to take as a reference. You can view the available evidence to draw any say two. Southern elephant seals are "typical" size difference - the average weight ywriter of males is three times more than females, is "typical" of polygamy - South Georgia Island, southern elephant seals, harem size of the peak at 100-150, larger and more small harem are rare, the vast majority of elephant seals do not have a wife, can only rely on having an affair. If you go back a thousand years ago a Chinese community, you might find an emperor harem thousand, a handful of the top ten harem, the majority of the population monogamy, a few men given no wife. Indeed, the two populations where you have seen the phenomenon of polygamy, but maybe you feel the same? Can analogy it? There is no gap between polygamy and monogamy, each species can have its own unique position of each individual within the species also can have its own unique state. Because elephant seals triploid ywriter type differential is polygamy, say 15% of the human body is also poor polygamy, it touches on easy terms, and covered many inside details. Biology to human nature, long way to go a step back. Suppose we find the foundation of human biology, and she found the foundation of marriage and biological characteristics of a particular form of the biosphere ywriter in the corresponding match. Then? From "human nature" worse part of it yet. First, push the human race from other creatures is a reference only thing. Second, evolution is lagging behind. It's ywriter all your history weighted points. Third, nobody provisions physical and mental evolution must be synchronized. If humans exist in a stable form for millions of years, then we can safely assume relatively recently been fully submerged hundreds of years earlier history of the pernicious influence, but common enough ywriter to adapt to the same physical and mental environment, reach coordination; however changes in recent years occurred in the human environment in upside down, it is assumed that not much basis. Even the human evolutionary psychology also dared not changed as a hypothesis, experiment to verify bring, how do you dare to make such a conclusion ywriter when copying over it?
And then step back. If really there is a reasonably summarized mankind "human nature", but we bypassed all of the above error to find it. Does it have some special sanctity, ywriter reflecting the nature of human reason human? No. Do not forget, this is the evolution of nature come, it is bound to change, is limited to the here and now, is temporary. "Nature" is the result of the environment, not the cause. As a decision maker may wish to nature as a prerequisite for the moment, but if you want some more universal discussion, we can not forget the past and present nature of nature is not necessarily the same as the next vice versa. ywriter Nature is not what the "essence" of things; fact once involved in evolution, it is nothing of the nature of things. Of course, we can see the evolution of the generally very slow, but not slow the evolution of what intrinsic properties, slow just because it was not strong enough selection pressure. Back to nature is good right?
Well, I'll write a post before put in here, be an outline of it. Should not only apply to the institution of marriage, but also for the vast majority of biologically "explain" efforts to shape human society. This marriage nor that marriage say two. Southern elephant seals are "typical" size difference - the average weight of males is three times more than females, is "typical" of polygamy - South Georgia Island, southern ywriter elephant seals, harem size of the peak at 100-150, larger and more small harem are rare, the vast majority of elephant seals do not have a wife, can only rely on having an affair. If you go back a thousand years ago a Chinese community, you might find an emperor harem thousand, a handful of the top ten harem, the majority of the population monogamy, a few men given no wife. Indeed, the two populations where you have seen the phenomenon ywriter of polygamy, but maybe you feel the same? Can analogy it? There is no gap between polygamy ywriter and monogamy, each species can have its own unique position of each individual within the species also can have its own unique state. Because elephant seals triploid type differential is polygamy, say 15% of the human body is also poor polygamy, it touches on easy terms, and covered many inside details. Biology to human nature, ywriter long way to go a step back. Suppose we find the foundation of human biology, and she found the foundation of marriage and biological characteristics of a particular form of the biosphere in the corresponding match. Then? From "human nature" worse part of it yet. First, push the human race from other creatures is a reference only thing. Second, evolution is lagging ywriter behind. It's all your history weighted points. Third, nobody provisions physical and mental evolution must be synchronized. If humans exist in a stable form for millions of years, then we can safely assume relatively recently been fully submerged hundreds of years earlier history of the pernicious influence, but common ywriter enough to adapt to the same physical and mental environment, reach coordination; however changes in recent years occurred in the human environment in upside down, it is assumed that not much basis. Even the human evolutionary psychology also dared not changed as a hypothesis, experiment to verify bring, how do you dare to make such a conclusion ywriter when copying over it?
And then step back. If really there is a reasonably summarized mankind ywriter "human nature", but we bypassed all of the above error to find it. Does it have some special sanctity, reflecting the nature of human reason human? No. Do not forget, this is the evolution of nature come, it is bound to change, is limited to the here and now, is temporary. "Nature" is the result of the environment, not the cause. As a decision maker may wish to nature as a prerequisite for the moment, but if you want some more universal discussion, we can not forget the past and present nature of nature is not necessarily the same as the next vice versa. Nature is not what the "essence" of things; fact once involved in evolution, it is nothing of the nature of things. Of course, we can see the evolution of the generally very slow, but not slow the evolution of what intrinsic properties, slow just because it was not strong enough selection pressure. Back to nature is good right?
2014-02-25 17:37
2014-02-27 00:25
After reading the second ywriter "Mythbusters" unarmed grasping arrows experiment, ywriter the experimenter success but once caught. . . Experiments ywriter bow bow more powerful than Japan's ancient ancient Japanese bamboo bow range is only about 30 meters, more powerful ywriter composite bows extremely rare that only generals to equipment. So modern compound bow "Mythbusters" for testing, arrow speed over one hundred km / sec, 200 meters ywriter above the estimated range, which is simply wrong of experimental results.
nancy 2014-02-26 21:54:58
How so Jingui strawberries in rustic comments
No comments:
Post a Comment