Analytically, let the functional jessika gedin systems by the return to the respective reference pr

That is probably true. But this leads me to the question of how much or little completed jessika gedin her collection "The / Die / The ... of society" is. You have the art, the economy, society, law, science, politics, religion, jessika gedin the educational system jessika gedin of the society but looked at. Truly a proud series.
But somehow academically. It is as if they had gone through the campus jessika gedin of their university and had written to every house on campus a text. In your area but were obviously not physicists, chemists, mathematicians, and also no doctors. Again, but "Nobody does, it wa do." jessika gedin Just take a wide berth to the philosophy, but also other disciplines.
One could say: Okay, this is done with the science of society. But what inartistic art, there is not only Picasso jessika gedin but in aid Dieter Bohlen. What about culture in a broader sense, with fashion, with urban development, with prostitution, with the ego?
Although I'm not Luhmann, but would still like to answer times. The reason for the lack of works to the listed objects is simply that they are not looking at the functional systems of society. But one must have understood the functionalist approach of Luhmann which returns each functional system to a specific social problem, for which each function system jessika gedin is the solution. This reference problems of individual functional systems I have reconstructed on my own blog recently: jessika gedin http://goo.gl/cKCkji
From this perspective, then presents culture is not the solution to a specific social problem, because every function system has in a sense, its own culture, fashion, language, architecture, etc. Culture is thus somehow transverse to the functional systems of society. Culture supports rather in all social situations, attention focusing, regardless of how this is done in detail. It will be exciting but only at the question of how this happens in detail. jessika gedin Luhmann has incidentally written once that culture would be the exchange on which options are traded on the current paradox unfolding.
Prostitution is a special problem of the economic system - scarce available sexual partners. If it does not work with the search for a sexual partner buys you look at the simple. jessika gedin The term "prostitution" is misleading in this context, because love can not be bought, if then just sex. For love there is no way faculty on a campus.
"Functional system" jessika gedin of society! If the number and its scope limited to those that Luhmann has pointed out there is missing or not because one or the other and if so what. Or, conversely, these functional systems are not the result of historical processes jessika gedin (Art gabs not always and economy is also relatively new) - ie. Respectively. is it possible to separate these systems function so well, as suggested by the titles of the books.
And b) in casting, there was the degree program, abbreviated as "H & E", jessika gedin which was in the 80s of Hygiene & Adult - about love is debated then probably at the Romanists. ;) Reply oh dear so is dat nothing
The first question: Assuming the problem constructions, as I have shown in my text, then there is initially no reason to assume that the number of functional systems must be limited to those that Luhmann has described in his monographs. But nevertheless I can beyond the effect hardly identify additional functional systems. Apart from the education system, jessika gedin I would go with full Luhmann. There have been attempts to identify other functional systems, such as sports or literature. They have, however, not convinced me, just because I can construct no problem, pose for the sports literature or society as a whole and an exclusive solution. Literature is clearly attributable to an art form, and thus the functional system of art for me.
Analytically, let the functional jessika gedin systems by the return to the respective reference problem relatively easy to tell apart. Empirically, however, one will often find that the corresponding functional native semantics are at least still a long way as far as functionally differentiated jessika gedin in Europe, as it suggests the theory. The reason is that here a hierarchical and thus pre-modern understanding of society is still maintained in Germany and Europe. This can be seen for example on the question of whether or not the economy or the policy should be given primacy in structuring the social order. Both views are based on a first principle and suggest that you had to pick one of the alternatives. But the transition from stratificatory to functional differentiation leads to a